Points to Remember:
- Parliamentary committees are crucial for legislative oversight and accountability.
- Different types of committees perform diverse functions.
- Effectiveness is influenced by factors like political will, resources, and expertise.
- Challenges include limited powers, lack of public awareness, and partisan politics.
- Reforms are needed to enhance their efficacy.
Introduction:
The Indian parliamentary system, modeled on the Westminster system, incorporates a robust committee system to ensure legislative oversight and accountability of the executive branch. Parliamentary committees act as vital watchdogs, scrutinizing government policies, budgets, and the implementation of laws. Their role extends beyond mere scrutiny; they contribute significantly to the quality of legislation and enhance transparency and public participation in governance. While the Constitution doesn’t explicitly mention parliamentary committees, their existence and functions are deeply embedded in parliamentary practice and conventions, evolving over time to meet the nation’s needs.
Body:
1. Types and Functions of Parliamentary Committees:
The Indian Parliament employs various types of committees, each with specific mandates:
Standing Committees: These are permanent committees dealing with specific ministries or subjects (e.g., Finance, Defence, Home Affairs). They examine the demands for grants, scrutinize bills, and monitor the implementation of government programs. Their reports often contain valuable recommendations for policy improvements.
Departmentally Related Standing Committees (DRSCs): These committees, established in 1993, are particularly significant for scrutinizing the budget and performance of ministries. They provide detailed examination and offer valuable insights into the effectiveness of government spending.
Select Committees: These are ad-hoc committees appointed to examine specific bills or issues. Their composition can vary depending on the nature of the issue. They offer detailed scrutiny and often suggest amendments to bills.
Estimates Committee: This committee examines the estimates included in the annual budget, identifying potential savings and suggesting improvements in government expenditure.
Public Accounts Committee (PAC): This is arguably the most powerful committee, examining the audit reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) and holding the executive accountable for public funds. Its findings often expose instances of financial mismanagement and irregularities.
2. Mechanisms for Oversight and Accountability:
Committees employ several mechanisms to ensure oversight and accountability:
Scrutiny of Bills: Committees examine bills clause by clause, inviting expert testimony and public input, thereby improving the quality of legislation.
Examination of Budgets: Detailed scrutiny of budgetary allocations ensures efficient and effective use of public funds.
Monitoring Government Programs: Committees monitor the implementation of government schemes and policies, identifying bottlenecks and suggesting improvements.
Summoning Witnesses: Committees can summon government officials and experts to provide testimony and information.
Submitting Reports: Committees submit detailed reports to
Parliament, highlighting their findings and recommendations. These reports are crucial for informing parliamentary debate and holding the executive accountable.
3. Challenges and Limitations:
Despite their importance, parliamentary committees face several challenges:
Limited Powers: Committees lack the power to compel witnesses or enforce their recommendations.
Lack of Resources: Some committees may lack adequate staff and resources to effectively carry out their functions.
Political Influence: Partisan politics can sometimes undermine the objectivity and effectiveness of committees.
Lack of Public Awareness: Limited public awareness of the work of committees hinders public participation and oversight.
Time Constraints: The short time allocated for committee work can limit the depth of scrutiny.
4. Case Studies and Examples:
Numerous instances demonstrate the impact of parliamentary committees. The PAC’s reports have often exposed corruption and financial irregularities, leading to investigations and reforms. The DRSCs have played a vital role in improving the efficiency of government spending. However, instances of ineffective scrutiny and limited impact also exist, highlighting the need for reforms.
Conclusion:
Parliamentary committees are indispensable for ensuring legislative oversight and accountability in India. Their diverse functions and mechanisms contribute significantly to good governance, transparency, and efficient use of public resources. However, challenges related to limited powers, resources, and political influence need to be addressed. Strengthening committees through enhanced resources, greater independence, and increased public awareness is crucial. Promoting a culture of transparency and accountability within the committees themselves is equally important. By empowering these crucial bodies, India can further strengthen its democratic institutions and ensure a more responsive and accountable government, ultimately contributing to holistic national development and upholding constitutional values.
KPSC Notes brings Prelims and Mains programs for KPSC Prelims and KPSC Mains Exam preparation. Various Programs initiated by KPSC Notes are as follows:-- KPSC Mains Tests and Notes Program 2025
- KPSC Prelims Exam 2024- Test Series and Notes Program 2025
- KPSC Prelims and Mains Tests Series and Notes Program 2025
- KPSC Detailed Complete Prelims Notes 2025